![]() UI does the rebase and if there are no conflicts, it will show some numbers against Push and Pull.Click okay on the Confirm Rebase dialog.Right click the branch you want to rebase on (typically master) and select "Rebase.".Talk to all team mates and ensure that no one is working on the branch you want to rebase.Source Tree Steps (See attached screenshot): It's also advisable to set "Use Safe Force Push (-force-with-lease)" to checked.Ensure that "Enabled Force Push" is checked.But, I will try and learn the commands soon.įor others reading this post, here's what worked for me: I think the commands are a bit confusing and I've liked the UI for merge based workflow. Tim Holloway wrote:Truthfully, I tend to avoid using the IDE to do complex and abstruse VC operations.I have mixed feelings about this. We do squash all our commit and delete the feature branch when merged. Rebasing is great when you're working on a small feature or bugfix branch by yourself, but as soon as more than one person works on the same branch, rebasing should no longer be used on pushed commits.Īgreed. Stephan van Hulst wrote:Merge-based workflows should be the norm. Stephan van Hulst wrote:Have you performed the "Git game" yet? In both cases, make sure to delete the feature branch to prevent other people from basing their work on old commits that won't be merged to master (because they were squashed/rebased). When you're happy with it, merge it to master. ![]() Use interactive rebase on this branch to shape the commit history of the feature. This will squash all unmerged commits on the feature branch into a single commit, which will then be merged.įor large features, first create a "staging" branch from your feature branch containing the commits that you want to merge to master. If you want a clean commit history on your dev/master branch, you can do two things:įor small features or bugfixes, use "squash merges" when you merge the feature branch to your dev/master branch. Rebasing is great when you're working on a small feature or bugfix branch by yourself, but as soon as more than one person works on the same branch, rebasing should no longer be used on pushed commits. Merge-based workflows should be the norm. Have you performed the "Git game" yet? It's great even if you're already familiar with most of Git's common operations: If you really want to rebase commits that have been pushed, I think you have two options: Either you 'force push' your rebased commits, or you configure the origin server that it doesn't complain about history rewriting. This is fine as long as your commits haven't been pushed to the origin server, but once you try to rebase commits that have already been pushed, the server will reject your push because you're telling it to drop commits that may already have been pulled by other users. ![]() It doesn't do this for rebasing, presumably because it's a natural operation to want to use. Git usually requires you to use a 'force' command line option to perform actions that rewrite history. A central theme in Git is that no matter what you do, you never lose history. Essentially you take old commits and replace them with new commits. I didn't read through your posts very carefully yet, so maybe I'm misunderstanding the problem, but it appears that you seem to be confused that your push is rejected after a rebase. I have seen similar results with IntelliJ and SourceTree as well. However, this results an unexpected output: The only thing works is a Pull followed by a Push. It does not allow the branch to be pushed. This sequence is intentionalĪs per my understanding, after rebasing feature on master, this is what I expect: M1-M2-M3-F1-F2-F3 (master/feature) Then, someone commits M3 on master and finally F3 is committed on feature branch. M1-M2-M3 (master)If my ascii design is not clear, M1 is the first commit to master, then M2. While I know how it should work theoretically, in practice, I am not able to get it to work. You need to force the push by typing this command in the terminal.I've recently switched to a rebase workflow. It's expected cause the local HEAD is behind due to git rebase that happens when you all do these steps. The last step is to push these changes to the remote branch, but Source Tree will keep telling you that you're behind and need to pull from remote.After that, you can right-click and edit the commit message accordingly.But if you just want to combine all, just select from the top and keep hitting the Squash with the previous button until it becomes one single commit. In section 1 you can squash, re-order the commit, or selectively combining it.A pop up will appear, just focus one 3 sections (1) List of commits, (2) Squash with the previous button, (3) OK button.Choose to rebase children of commit_hash interactively.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |